List journal issues    
 
 
Home List journal issues Table of contents Subscribe to JEGP

Book Review

Volume 108 • Number 1

January 2009



 

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Nun's Priest's Tale on CD-ROM. Edited by Paul Thomas. The Canterbury Tales Project. Birmingham: Scholarly Digital Editions, 2006. $85 (individual license) or $230 (institutional license).

This CD-ROM edition of Chaucer's Nun's Priest's tale is the fourth in a series of single-tale CDs produced by the Canterbury tales Project, the others being the Wife of Bath's Tale (1996), General Prologue (2000), and Miller's Tale (2004). The project has also produced CD-ROM editions of two important witnesses to the complete Canterbury Tales, the Hengwrt Manuscript in the National Library of Wales (2001) and the pair of editions by William Caxton, from copies in the British Library (2003). the series of single-tale editions is an interesting experiment in a computer-based approach to presenting a text of which multiple versions exist. A commonplace of late twentieth-century critiques of traditional editorial practice states that, while a critical edition does represent all witnesses with its lists of variants, nevertheless the editor's choice of a base manuscript governs and mediates the presentation of all the other witnesses, and the eclectic "correction" of the base text with preferred variants from other manuscripts means that the critical edition offers a text that is new and idiosyncratic. In the name of reconstructing the author's "final intentions," a new and non-authorial version of the text is authored by the editor, and, because the other versions are reduced to lists of variants (printed in small type at the bottom of the page or at the back of the book) the user's access to the versions that the editor does not prefer is limited. In many cases, such as when there are a limited number of witnesses to a text, varying only in a limited number of readings, such a critical edition may be adequate; however, in cases of complex textual transmission the inadequacies of this approach multiply exponentially with the increase in divergencies among witnesses to the text. Such is the case, of course, with respect to the Canterbury Tales, for which there are some 70 fifteenth-century witnesses to all or parts of the text, with substantial variability.

view PDF
 

 

 

 
Home | Issue Index
 
© 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Content in the Journal of English and Germanic Philology is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the Journal of English and Germanic Philology database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.


Terms and Conditions of Use